Remington’s 700 series, which began with the Model 721 shortly after World War II, has been wildly popular not only with hunters and target shooters, but also with law enforcement and the U.S. The settlement covers more than a dozen models of Remington guns, specifically the Model 700, Seven, Sportsman 78, 673, 710, 715, 770, 600, 660, XP-100, 721, 722 and 725. For guns that cannot be retrofitted, the company plans to offer vouchers for Remington products.

Many users had new trigger mechanisms installed on their own, and Remington will reimburse them as part of the settlement. Under the settlement, which still must be approved by a judge, Remington has agreed to retrofit the rifles in question at no cost to the owner. Remington denied the allegations, calling them “inaccurate, misleading, (and) taken out of context.” Last year, a judge dismissed several of the claims, including negligence and fraudulent concealment, but by mid-summer of 2014, the parties announced they were working out details of a “nationwide class settlement” involving the controversial Model 7.

Pollard’s suit accused Remington of “negligence, breach of warranty, unfair and deceptive trade practices, and fraudulent concealment”. Ian Pollard of Concordia, Missouri, initiated a class action suit in 2013 while claiming that his Remington 700 rifle fired on multiple occasions without the trigger being pulled. The company has been riddled for years with claims the gun can fire without the trigger being pulled, often with deadly results.” An article posted on CNBC’s website in early December revealed that Remington has agreed to replace triggers in almost every Model 7 ever made. “America’s oldest gun manufacturer, Remington, has agreed to replace millions of triggers in its most popular product-the Model 700 rifle.

Remington sportsman 78 vs 700